User talk:Imtisig
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Imtisig! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Synorem (talk) 05:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Edit summary
[edit]Hello Imtisig, and thanks for your work.
Please remember to always include an edit summary for each edit, as explained at WP:CTW. Gderrin (talk) 09:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Sentence case
[edit]Thank you for your contributions! Moving forward, do note that in according with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style the titles of articles and headings used sentence case per WP:TITLECASE. See Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style for a jumpstart on common style conventions. The template {{circa}} is also generally favorable to presenting it manually, as it gives a dotted underline to the "c.
" that readers can hover over to see a tooltip of what it means. Keep up the good work! —Sirdog (talk) 06:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Zeal & Ardor edits
[edit]I noticed you changed the quote from Manuel in the Zeal & Ardor article from "don't give a shit about you" to "don't care about you". Please avoid doing this, as wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED and it is a direct quote. Later down you again changed the grammar of a direct quote. WP:QUOTE lays out the guidelines for quoted text, it should be verbatim from the source with no additional changes. RF23 (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You for notifying me. I will take care next time. Imtisig (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graham87 (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Your editing pattern is highly suspicious and you've clearly been making semi-automated grammatical edits, parts of which have been disruptive. Graham87 (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]
Imtisig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello! Since I believe my block was a mistake, I request the unblock for my account. But in case it's related to the warning from the other fellow editor regarding the direct quote editing, I took that lesson right away as I received the message to which I then replied. As the reason for my block, an abuse of editing privileges stated. I've looked into what is meant by this category and what was listed there made me think that this's a mistake. Imtisig (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock request. Act II
[edit]Imtisig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello again. I apologize for applying in an improper way the first time. I can assure that I won't be committing disruptive/semi-automated edits further. As of now, there are 7 reverts out of 400 edits on record but I'll strive to never let the reverts number rise. I want to make significant contributions to Wikipedia and plan to publish notable articles related to art, history, culture, etc. Imtisig (talk) 13:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblocked
[edit]Apologies as this is very late, but I've unblocked your account, given that you've accepted responsibility for your previous semi-automated edits and agreed not to repeat them again. Please let me know if you have any questions about editing :) Elli (talk | contribs) 05:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)